Editors Note: Jen wrote this on Saturday when the WSH conference was in full swing. The conference has now come to a close and we are enjoying some quiet time in Old San Juan – RA
Hola from sunny, humid San Juan, Puerto Rico! The Work, Stress, and Health Conference is in full force now and I have a bit of time before my next session, so I thought I’d reflect on a common theme that has emerged for me so far:
Bridging the gap between science and practice
We talk about this a lot in our field because of its applied nature but in my experience not many have actually DONE anything to build this bridge. Academics and practitioners live in different worlds, have different goals, interact with different kinds of people, and speak different languages (e.g., academics don’t regularly refer to employees as “talent”).
But we need to focus on our similarities in order to form partnerships. We all want to make the world a better place to work. The only way we can do that is if we find some way to feed the science-practice feedback loop.
One way to do this is through exchanging information. Enter OPIEWeb. As an academic, I fully admit that I have very limited practical experience. I’ve never tried to implement a 360 feedback system. I’ve never conducted any organizational training. My strengths lie in more “academic” (okay, geeky) sorts of things. I’d love to hear from more practitioners on OPIEWeb and learn about the realities (and hardships) of putting research into practice so that I can, in turn, do better research.
My point in a few words: We can learn from each other. Let’s use OPIEWeb as a tool for doing that.
